What kind of production can be used as evidence in Hard Records?

The correct choice emphasizes the importance of using production data that has been verified by a third party approved by the company. In the context of Hard Records, claims or evidence presented must meet stringent criteria for credibility. When production is validated by an independent entity that is recognized and trusted, it ensures that the information is accurate and reliable. This type of documentation can be crucial when resolving disputes or assessing claims related to crop insurance.

In contrast, personal notes and assessments may lack the rigor and impartiality required to serve as substantial evidence, as they are subjective and can vary greatly from one individual to another. Community average yield data may provide useful context but does not necessarily reflect the actual production levels of a specific operation. Similarly, while statewide yield averages can be informative, they do not offer the precise verification needed for Hard Records as they can be influenced by various factors across different regions. Thus, the verification by a company-approved third party is paramount in this context, reinforcing the reliability and acceptance of the production evidence presented.